The Selfish Gene
Chiswick Chap · CC BY-SA 4.0
D. Hamilton's work on kin selection. The book introduced the term meme for a unit of cultural evolution analogous to the gene, and memetics has become a subject in its own right. The 'selfish gene' is a metaphor for the gene-centred view of evolution, not about a particular gene causing selfish behaviour; much of the book is devoted to explaining the evolution of altruism.
- author
- Richard Dawkins
- field
- Evolutionary biology, popular science
- subject
- Gene-centred view of evolution, altruism, memes
- known_for
- Introducing the term 'meme', popularizing kin selection and inclusive fitness
Lore & Background
W. D. Hamilton and others developed this approach further during the 1960s, opposing the concepts of group selection and of selection aimed directly at benefit to the individual organism. The book's central metaphor is a means of explicating the gene-centred view of evolution. Dawkins recalls showing The Selfish Gene to Tom Maschler, who 'liked the book but not the title' and suggested The Immortal Gene. Dawkins writes that 'Maschler may have been right. Many critics, especially vociferous ones learned in philosophy as I have discovered, prefer to read a book by title only.' He laments that 'Too many people read it by title only.' In response, he expanded on the evolution of altruism in the BBC documentary Nice Guys Finish First. The book's contents include chapters on replicators, immortal coils, gene machines, aggression, genesmanship, family planning, battle of the generations, battle of the sexes, reciprocal altruism, and memes. Dawkins introduces the term replicator to describe self-replicating molecules like DNA and RNA, and discusses John Maynard Smith's evolutionarily stable strategy, kin selection, David Lack's principle, R. L. Trivers's concept of parental investment, and Darwin's theory of sexual selection.
Reader's Guide
The Selfish Gene was extremely popular when published and remains widely read. Proponents argue that the central point, that replicating the gene is the object of selection, usefully completes and extends Darwin's explanation of evolution. Peter Medawar wrote that it is 'a most skillful reformulation of the central problems of social biology in terms of the genetical theory of natural selection. Beyond this, it is learned, witty and very well written.' W. D. Hamilton wrote that 'The book should be read, can be read, by almost anyone.
Did You Know?
- The book introduced the term 'meme' for a unit of cultural evolution analogous to the gene.
- Dawkins wished he had titled it The Immortal Gene, as suggested by Tom Maschler.
- The 'selfish gene' is a metaphor; much of the book explains the evolution of altruism.
- John Maynard Smith wrote that the book made an original contribution to biology despite being a popular account.
Intellectual Roots and the Gene-Centred Thesis
W. D. R. A. Fisher and J. B. S. Haldane had laid earlier groundwork for understanding how kinship increases the probability of shared genes. Dawkins wove these threads into a unified narrative, popularising Hamilton's kin-selection logic while also making original contributions that would go on to stimulate research into human inclusive fitness.
The Meme and a New Vocabulary for Culture
One of the book's most consequential contributions extends far beyond biology. In the course of explaining how self-replicating entities drive evolutionary change, Dawkins coined the word "meme" to describe a unit of cultural transmission that parallels the gene in the biological world. The idea was that cultural ideas, behaviours, and styles replicate, mutate, and compete in a manner loosely analogous to genetic inheritance. The book's broader influence on the study of human behaviour has been equally significant: by making Hamilton's kin-selection arguments accessible to a general audience, Dawkins helped stimulate a wave of research into human inclusive fitness, the idea that the degree of genetic relatedness between two individuals shapes the likelihood of cooperative behaviour. In this way, a popular-science volume published in the mid-1970s quietly reshaped both evolutionary biology and the emerging science of cultural transmission.
A Title That Bites Back
Dawkins has spoken openly about the frustration the book's name caused him. When he first showed the manuscript to his editor Tom Maschler, the editor praised the work but objected to the title, proposing instead The Immortal Gene. Dawkins concedes that Maschler may well have been right, acknowledging that the phrase "selfish gene" standing alone, without the context of the full text, can mislead readers into thinking the book is about a particular gene that drives selfish behaviour. In reality, much of the volume is devoted to explaining the evolution of altruism. Dawkins laments that too many people judge the work by its title alone, comparing the problem to how a title like The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire works because it accurately signals the content, whereas "The Selfish Gene" does not. To set the record straight, he later produced the BBC documentary Nice Guys Finish First, in which he expanded on the book's treatment of altruistic behaviour and the gene-centred logic that makes cooperation among relatives an evolutionary success.
From Replicators to Sexual Selection: The Book's Architecture
The book's nine chapters trace a logical arc from the origin of life to the intricacies of mating strategies. Dawkins opens by crediting Darwin and Wallace with discovering natural selection, the mechanism that explains why a species achieves genuine self-awareness about its own origins. He then introduces the concept of the replicator—the first self-copying molecule in the primordial soup—and follows its trajectory through the emergence of cells, bodies, and eventually complex organisms. A central analytical tool is John Maynard Smith's evolutionarily stable strategy, illustrated by the hawks-and-doves model in which a fifty-fifty split between aggressive and non-aggressive individuals resists invasion by any alternative. Kin selection occupies a major chapter, drawing on the work of Fisher, Haldane, and Hamilton to show why an individual who sacrifices itself to save ten close relatives still preserves more copies of the relevant gene than it loses. Later chapters tackle David Lack's principle on clutch size, R. L. Trivers's parental-investment theory, and Darwin's sexual selection, using the extreme case of harem-keeping elephant seals—where four percent of males secure eighty-eight percent of copulations—to illustrate why a balanced sex ratio remains evolutionarily stable.
Gallery

Frequently Asked Questions
Who wrote The Selfish Gene and what is it about?
Richard Dawkins, an evolutionary biologist, published this popular science book in 1976 to explain evolution from the perspective of the gene rather than the organism. Its central argument is that natural selection operates primarily at the level of genes, which are the replicating units of heredity.
What does the phrase 'selfish gene' actually mean?
It is a metaphor for a gene-centred view of evolution, not a claim that any particular gene drives organisms to act selfishly. Dawkins uses the language to describe how genes compete for replication across generations, a process that can produce both selfish and cooperative behaviours in the organisms that carry them.
What is a meme according to The Selfish Gene?
Dawkins coined the term in the book to describe a unit of cultural transmission that spreads from mind to mind, analogous to how genes spread through biological reproduction. The concept later gave rise to the field of memetics, which studies how ideas, behaviours, and styles replicate in human culture.
How does The Selfish Gene explain altruism?
A large portion of the book is devoted to showing how apparently selfless behaviour can emerge from gene-level selection, drawing heavily on W.D. Hamilton's work on kin selection and inclusive fitness. Dawkins argues that helping close relatives can be genetically advantageous because they share copies of the same genes.
Why is The Selfish Gene considered important?
The book made the gene-centred view of evolution and concepts like inclusive fitness accessible to a general audience, reshaping how many people think about natural selection. It also introduced the word 'meme' into everyday language, spawning an entirely new area of study in cultural evolution.
More in Philosophy & Theory 1-24
Spotted an error? Know more?
This is a living reference — every entry is fact-audited, and reader corrections feed straight into our audit queue. Suggest an edit · See this site's audit record
